Why you don’t want 2 executors

When it comes to estate planning, you may be tempted to name two executors when creating your last will and testament. While some individuals may consider appointing multiple executors to distribute the responsibilities, it is essential to weigh the potential drawbacks of this approach. In this blog post, we will explore why having two executors may not be optimal and discuss the advantages of utilizing professional executor services. By understanding the potential pitfalls and exploring the benefits of professional executor services, you can make an informed decision that promotes a seamless and efficient estate settlement process.

What is a co-executor?

Administering a loved one’s estate is challenging, so some individuals choose to have multiple executors to help shoulder the responsibility. When more than one person is named executor, it is referred to as co-executor or successor executor. Essentially, co-executors share the role of managing the estate and must work together to make joint decisions. In some cases, co-executors may each be responsible for handling specific duties. This can help divide the workload and reduce the strain on any one individual. However, it is important to note that disagreements among co-executors can sometimes arise, making it essential to choose individuals willing to work together and communicate effectively.

Understand the differences between an executor and a co-executor

When executing a will, it’s essential to understand the differences between an executor and a co-executor. An executor is a person named in the will who carries out the deceased’s final wishes, while the co-executor shares that responsibility. Co-executors are often called when the executor needs additional help or support in completing the required tasks. Choosing the right people for these roles is essential, as they will be responsible for settling the estate, paying off debts, and distributing assets. Those appointed to execute a will must work closely together to ensure everything is done correctly and efficiently.

Two Executor services working together

Duties of a co-executor

When appointed as a co-executor, individuals share the responsibilities of administering an estate alongside another co-executor. Here are some key duties of a co-executor and the benefits of utilizing executor services in fulfilling these responsibilities:

  • Collaboration and Decision-Making: Co-executors must work collaboratively and make decisions jointly regarding the estate administration. This includes tasks such as asset management, debt settlement, and distribution of the estate.
  • Communication and Coordination: Co-executors should maintain regular contact to ensure they are on the same page regarding the progress of estate administration. They need to coordinate their efforts, share information, and consult with each other when making important decisions.
  • Asset Identification and Management: Co-executors identify and manage the estate’s assets. This involves gathering relevant documents, valuing assets, and ensuring proper safeguarding throughout the administration process.
  • Debt Settlement and Financial Obligations: Co-executors must settle the deceased’s outstanding debts and financial obligations. This includes paying off debts, filing tax returns, and addressing liabilities to ensure the estate’s financial affairs are appropriately managed.
  • Distribution of Assets: Co-executors work together to distribute the estate’s remaining assets to the beneficiaries according to the instructions in the will. They must ensure fair and accurate distribution while adhering to legal requirements and any specific provisions outlined in the will.
  • Legal and Tax Compliance: Co-executors are responsible for complying with all legal and tax obligations associated with estate administration. This includes filing necessary legal documents, obtaining clearances, and ensuring proper tax compliance.
  • Record-Keeping and Reporting: Co-executors must maintain accurate records of financial transactions, communications, and actions taken during the estate administration. They are responsible for preparing periodic reports or accountings to be submitted to the court or beneficiaries as required.
  • Accountability and Fiduciary Duty: Co-executors have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the estate and the beneficiaries. They must work honestly, transparently, and responsibly, ensuring their actions align with the testator’s wishes and applicable laws.

Advantages of a co-executor

When it comes to estate planning, choosing who will carry out your final wishes can be a weighty decision. One option is to appoint co-executors, assigning two or more individuals to cooperate to fulfill your desires. Some benefits associated with designating co-executors include the following:

  • Shared Responsibilities: With co-executors, the workload can be shared, reducing the burden on any one individual. Each co-executor can contribute their skills and expertise, making it more manageable to handle the various tasks involved in estate administration.
  • Checks and Balances: Co-executors provide a system of checks and balances. They can oversee each other’s actions, ensuring transparency and minimizing the risk of errors or misconduct. This can help protect the interests of the estate and beneficiaries.
  • Complementary Skills and Expertise: Co-executors may possess different skills and areas of expertise. By combining their knowledge and experiences, they can bring diverse perspectives to estate administration. This can be particularly advantageous when dealing with complex financial or legal intricacies.
  • Continuity and Backup: If one co-executor cannot fulfill their duties due to illness, incapacity, or other reasons, the other co-executor can step in and ensure the seamless continuation of estate administration. This provides a built-in backup system to maintain the progress of the administration process.
  • Reduced Conflicts: Having co-executors who work well together can help prevent conflicts and disagreements that may arise if a single executor makes all decisions independently. Co-executors can consult and collaborate, promoting consensus and harmony during the administration process.
  • Shared Accountability: Co-executors share the responsibility and accountability for their actions. This can help ensure that decisions are made collectively and responsibly, minimizing the risk of individual errors or misconduct.
  • Efficiency and Expediency: With multiple co-executors, tasks can be accomplished more efficiently. They can divide and conquer various aspects of estate administration, allowing faster progress and quicker resolution of administrative matters.
  • Flexibility and Support: Co-executors can support each other during the estate administration. They can share the workload, offer guidance and assistance, and provide emotional support when needed.

Two thumbs for executor services

Disadvantages of a co-executor

When it comes to estate planning, it is common for individuals to appoint a co-executor to ensure their wishes are met after passing away. While there are advantages to designating co-executors, it is also essential to consider potential disadvantages. Some drawbacks of having co-executors for estate administration include:

  • Decision-Making Challenges: Co-executors may have differing opinions or conflicting ideas on handling certain aspects of estate administration. Disagreements and delays in decision-making can arise, leading to potential conflicts and inefficiencies in the administration process.
  • Coordination and Communication Issues: Coordinating efforts and maintaining effective communication between co-executors can be challenging, especially if they have different schedules, priorities, or communication styles. Lack of coordination can result in confusion, duplication of efforts, or gaps in the administration process.
  • Increased Administrative Burden: Having co-executors can increase the administrative burden. Coordinating their actions, seeking consensus, and obtaining signatures or approvals from multiple parties may lead to additional time, effort, and paperwork.
  • Potential for Disputes and Conflicts: Even with the best intentions, disputes or conflicts between co-executors can arise, particularly if they have different views on administering the estate or handling specific matters. Disagreements may prolong the administration process and strain relationships.
  • Complexity in Relationships: If the co-executors are family members or close friends, the dynamics of their relationships can impact the administration process. Emotional tensions, family conflicts, or individual differences may interfere with effective decision-making and compromise the smooth administration of the estate.
  • Difficulty in Holding Executors Accountable: When multiple co-executors are involved, holding each executor individually accountable for their actions or omissions can be challenging. Proving individual responsibility for errors or breaches of fiduciary duty may become more complicated.
  • Increased Costs: Co-executors may require legal or financial professionals to mediate conflicts or assist with decision-making, leading to higher costs. Additionally, legal proceedings may be necessary to resolve disputes if disagreements escalate, increasing expenses.

How to remove a co-executor

When a co-executor is initially chosen to manage an estate, it is hoped that they will work collaboratively and effectively to carry out their duties. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. Removing a successor’s executor services from their role in estate administration can be necessary under certain circumstances. There are three common ways to remove a successor executor:

  1. Removal by the Testator: The testator, the individual who created the will, can remove a successor executor by amending their will. This can be done by executing a new will that explicitly revokes the appointment of the successor executor or by creating an addendum. This legal document modifies or repeals specific provisions of an existing choice.
  2. Resignation: A successor executor may voluntarily resign from their role by submitting a written resignation to the court or the appropriate legal authority overseeing the estate administration. The successor executor needs to follow the legal procedures and requirements for resignation, which may involve obtaining court approval or notifying interested parties.
  3. Removal by the Court: If substantial reasons exist to remove a successor executor, interested parties can petition the court for their removal. Valid reasons for removal may include misconduct, failure to fulfill their duties, conflicts of interest, or inability to administer the estate effectively. The court will evaluate the evidence and decide based on what is deemed in the best interests of the estate and the beneficiaries.


Serving as a co-executor can be an essential role for many people, especially family members looking to help their loved ones find peace after death. It should not be taken lightly because there are both advantages and disadvantages associated with the position. Executors should weigh the costs and benefits carefully when deciding who should (and shouldn’t) serve as co-executors. Removing a co-executor is possible through specific legal steps — though it’s best to do so without creating unnecessary stress or rifts between those involved. Hopefully, this article sheds some light on what a co-executor does and how they can help fulfill the deceased’s wishes effectively.


Can I change my decision to have two executors?

If you have already designated two executors, you can revise your estate planning documents to appoint a single executor instead. It is advisable to consult with legal professionals to make the necessary amendments.

Are there alternatives to having two executors?

Yes, there are alternatives to having two executors. One option is to appoint a single executor who can consult with trusted advisors or professionals to gain expertise in specific areas when needed. This allows for efficient decision-making while ensuring accountability and responsibility.

Will having two executors speed up the administration process?

Not necessarily. Multiple executors can slow down the administration process due to the need for consensus and collaboration on every decision. Disagreements and conflicts may prolong the time it takes to settle the estate.

Do we need to have two executors distribute the workload?

While having two executors may distribute the workload, it can also lead to confusion and duplication of efforts. Coordinating and synchronizing actions between co-executors can be challenging, potentially causing inefficiencies.

Do we need to have two executors provide checks and balances?

While checks and balances may seem appealing, they often result in disagreements and impasses between co-executors. Decision-making may become more complex, leading to potential conflicts and delays in estate administration.